Virginia Commonwealth University is committed to maintaining learning and work environments free from conflict of interest, exploitation, or favoritism. The existence of such relationships casts doubt on the objectivity of any supervision and evaluation provided. The integrity of the University’s educational mission is promoted by professionalism that derives from mutual trust and respect in instructor-student relationships. Similarly, the University is committed to the principle of protecting the integrity and objectivity of its employees in the performance of their University duties. It is therefore fundamental to the University’s overall mission that the professional responsibilities of its faculty and staff be carried out in an atmosphere that is free of conflicts of interest that compromise these principles. There are special risks in any sexual or romantic relationship between individuals in inherently unequal positions of power such as instructor and student, supervisor and employee. Such relationships create obvious dangers for abuse of authority and conflict of interest whether actual, potential, and apparent. Such relationships may be less consensual than the individual whose position confers power believes.
ARE THERE ANY PROHIBITED AMOROUS RELATIONSHIPS AMONG UNIVERSITY COMMUNITY MEMBERS?
Brandeis University is committed to maintaining a fair and professional academic, work and athletic environment in which members of the faculty and staff carry out their responsibilities in a way that is both respectful to those over whom they have authority and conducive to the development of a just and flourishing academic community. A sexual or romantic relationship between a faculty or a staff member and a person with whom they have professional responsibility i. With professional responsibility comes power.
It is incumbent on faculty and staff members not to abuse, or seem to abuse, the power with which they are entrusted. In order to avoid potential conflicts of interest, favoritism, exploitation, harassment or breaches of professional standards, the university prohibits romantic or sexual relationships, even when consensual, where there is supervision, direction or control between the parties.
The integrity of the teacher-student relationship is the foundation of the “Teachers” includes, but is not limited to, all ladder and non-ladder faculty of the.
Consensual romantic relationships between undergraduate students and faculty are not necessarily common, but they are potentially high-risk because they can generate costly sexual harassment claims by students against colleges and universities. In addition, they may damage participants professionally and personally. These faculty members often claimed consensual relationships with the complaining students.
In the past few years, national media attention has focused on multiple high-profile sexual harassment allegations against professors, including several who had consensual relationships with students. In their efforts to prevent sexual harassment, institutions should review and, if appropriate, consider updating their written consensual relationship policies.
UE does not recommend remaining silent on this issue. Schools can take one of three approaches to regulating relationships between faculty and undergraduate students.
What are U of T’s policies on student-professor relationships?
The relationship between teacher and student is the foundation of the academic mission of the University. This relationship vests considerable trust in the teacher, who, in turn, bears the responsibility to serve as mentor, educator, and evaluator. In discharging this responsibility, teachers are accountable for behaving in a manner that reflects the highest levels of professional responsibility, recognizes the dignity and worth of each person at the University, and protects the integrity of the student-teacher relationship.
This Policy applies to faculty, academic staff, and graduate teaching dating, and/or sexual nature entered into with consent of both parties.
Institutions tend to either ban student-faculty dating altogether or where a supervisory relationship exists. The ages of the couple — her, 25; him, 71 — are unusually far apart. Princeton, like a growing number of institutions, has banned all student-faculty relationships, including for graduate students. Platt has said that she waited until two years after her graduation to ask Mitchell out. Mitchell, who is currently on preplanned leave, is just one of a number of professors to engage in or attempt to initiate a relationship with a former student or students.
Still, experts with different positions on student-faculty dating advise against adopting any kind of timeline for dating former students. Andrew T. There are a lot of questions that will arise, with too many anomalies as far as circumstances. Just not now. According to court documents, Barrett sent a student of his a Facebook friend request at the end of the spring semester, when she was in his class. The two corresponded over the summer about the student’s writing.
Back on campus in the fall, the student asked to meet Barrett for coffee, and they began dating. The first student later filed a complaint with the university, alleging that Barrett had touched her genitals while she was sleeping during their relationship.
UPPS 04.04.39 – Consensual Relationships
To address situations in which two persons have an apparently voluntary romantic or sexual relationship, but where a power differential exists because of their roles within the university, e. The University of Kansas has a tradition of commitment to providing an academic community environment that, without discrimination, fosters intellectual, professional and personal growth.
Central to the preservation of this environment is the trust that should characterize all interactions among those working toward the common goal of the institution, namely, our students, faculty, unclassified staff, and university support staff. This trust is put at risk when members of the University community engage in consenting romantic or sexual relationships that involve persons of unequal power, for example, administrator and faculty, faculty and student, supervisor and employee.
Northwestern’s policy on graduate student-faculty dating restricting relationships where an evaluative authority exists reflects a Title IX-era trend.
Physical contact is not a required element of such relationships. A Covered Relationship may exist on the basis of a single interaction. The University of Michigan strives to create and maintain a community that enables each person to reach their full potential. To do so requires an environment of trust, openness, civility, and respect. The teacher-student relationship lies at the foundation of the educational process.
As a matter of sound judgment and professional ethics, faculty members have a responsibility to avoid any apparent or actual conflict between their professional responsibilities and personal relationships with students. Faculty have a collective responsibility to the student experience as members and representatives of the University community, and with each class of incoming students who are bound together in space and time.
The faculty at the University fulfill their essential role with students in learning, research, and service environments, and do so with a commitment to honoring the highest professional and ethical standards. An overarching goal for the context of the faculty-student relationship is to create a professional, productive, and equitable environment for independent learning and academic growth.
Student well-being and the pursuit of academic excellence are central to any faculty-student relationship. At its best, the faculty-student relationship nurtures the advancement and pursuit of knowledge and can lead to life-long professional mentorships and connections. At its worst, the inherent imbalance in the power dynamic between faculty and students can lead to real or perceived exploitation of the power differential.
In all cases, a Covered Teacher defined below is prohibited from having a Covered Relationship defined below with any Learner defined below in a class, lab, field, or other setting in which the Covered Teacher has Academic or Supervisory Authority defined below over the Learner. As defined more specifically below, Faculty Members are subject to broader prohibitions than other Covered Teachers.
Consensual Intimate Relationship Policy Regarding Undergraduate Students
The University of Texas at El Paso is committed to maintaining learning and work environments as free as possible from conflicts of interest and favoritism. The University recognizes that two consenting adults should be free to conduct a personal relationship where the relationship does not interfere with the goals and policies of the University. Some romantic, dating or sexual relationships, while consensual, create conflicts of interests.
This policy addresses those consensual relationships. This policy applies to all University administrators, faculty, staff, and students. This policy is applicable regardless of the gender of the University employee with supervisory, teaching, evaluation or advisory authority, or gender of the employee, student or student employee who is directly or indirectly being supervised, taught, evaluated, or advised.
As one graduate.
This policy also prohibits faculty and coaches from engaging in romantic, dating, or sexual relationships with Northwestern undergraduate students, regardless of whether there is a supervisory or evaluative relationship between them. Other types of relationships are also addressed in this policy, which can be viewed here. The University Policy on Non-Retaliation prohibits the taking of any retaliatory action for reporting or inquiring about alleged improper or wrongful activity.
The Policy on Prohibited Use of Electronic Resources for Threats, Harassment, and Pornography provides guidance on the prohibited use of University Electronic Resources for making threats, engaging in harassing behavior, and viewing, downloading, or communicating pornography. The Policy on Civility states that members of the Northwestern community are expected to deal with each other with respect and consideration. See also: Faculty Handbook , under the “Responsibilities of the Faculty” section.
Use of listservs must be consistent with all applicable University policies, including but not limited to the Student Code of Conduct, Staff, Faculty, and Student Handbooks, NUIT policies, residence hall policies, as well as with state, federal and local laws.
Policy on Consensual Intimate Relationships
For a hardcopy pdf of this document, contact the Office of Compliance Responsible Officer:. Associate Vice Chancellor-Human Resources.
A consensual relationship is defined as any consensual dating, romantic, This policy will be distributed to all faculty, staff, students, administrators, and will be.
R omantic relationships between university professors and their students are becoming less and less acceptable. Many of the new university policies that have emerged in the last few years have focused on undergraduates and how to better protect them, typically with a campus-wide ban on staff dating undergrads. But a number of universities also demand that faculty members do not start relationships with graduate students they supervise.
This month, Princeton University went further and declared that faculty members were no longer allowed to date any graduate student—even if the couple works in different departments. Pre-existing relationships are exempt from the new rule. The university is encouraging greater collaboration across departments, Burdine says, which extends the concerns about unequal power between a professor and a student beyond the immediate supervisory relationship.
Princeton is the first university to take the campus-wide step but others will follow, says Jamelle Sharpe , who works at the University of Illinois College of Law in Urbana-Champaign and has surveyed academic policies in this area.
Faculty, administrators, and others who educate, supervise, evaluate, employ, counsel, coach or otherwise make decisions or recommendations as to the other person in connection with their employment or education at the University, or who otherwise have actual or apparent authority over a student or subordinate, should understand the fundamentally asymmetrical nature of the relationship.
Such relationships are prohibited. Intimate Relationships between the following individuals are specifically prohibited:. This list is not exhaustive; other circumstances in which one individual has greater power or authority over another may also violate this policy. If individuals already in an Intimate Relationship foresee the possibility of entering into a relationship of power or authority for example, through one party enrolling in a program or a class, or taking up a new position , or where an Intimate Relationship arises in the context of an existing relationship of power or authority, the individual with supervisory, evaluative or other position of authority and power must notify the relevant supervisors, directors or deans immediately.
This policy applies to all University employees (including faculty), student prior to the effective date of this policy to the University offices specified above as.
The University of Texas System institutions and the University of Texas System Administration shall adopt policies addressing consensual relationships. The policies shall comply in all substantive respects with a model developed by the Office of General Counsel, shall be published in the institutional Handbook of Operating Procedures, and shall include, at a minimum, the following elements:. Such relationships are prohibited even if only a single event.
If managing the conflict is not possible, the relationship is prohibited. System Administration and institutions may develop and adopt more stringent consensual relationship policies or adopt more stringent policies for specific units where it is not possible to manage the conflict inherent in the relationship. In any event, failure to disclose the relationship and document Sec.
1.7.2 Consensual Sexual or Romantic Relationships In the Workplace and Educational Setting
To advance its educational mission, Carnegie Mellon University is committed to creating and maintaining a learning and work environment that fosters creativity, growth, emotional and physical wellbeing and the pursuit of scientific, academic and artistic excellence. The willingness and ability of individuals in this community to form close, professional relationships is critical to the success of this commitment.
They also encourage the reasonable perception of placing others who do not engage in similar intimate relations at a disadvantage or the reasonable perception that the University condones the unfair and potentially exploitative exercise of professional authority and institutional influence.
At San Diego State University, faculty and staff must abide by the consensual relationships policy set forth in the Executive Order The policy.
The University has an interest in ensuring that academic, employment, and business matters are decided on objective bases. At an institution such as the University of Arizona, a variety of personal and romantic relationships may exist among employees, University agents, students, and third parties. The University establishes this personnel policy to address conflicts of interest arising from interpersonal relationships not otherwise covered by existing policies or law.
The intent of this policy is to direct employees to disclose relationships that have created or may create conflicts of interest and to give the University an opportunity to manage and reconcile any such conflicts, if possible. Employees who violate this policy may be subject to disciplinary action; however, because this policy is designed to encourage employees to disclose personal relationships that may give rise to or have given rise to conflicts of interest, an alleged violation of this policy may not be a basis upon which employees may file grievances against one another.
Relationships with Students Outside the Instructional, Supervisory, or Evaluative Context: Romantic or sexual relationships between employees and students when the employees do not have a direct instructional, supervisory, or evaluative responsibility with respect to the student are not per se prohibited. They may, however, result in a conflict of interest, particularly when the employee and student are in the same unit or in units that are allied.
In such situations, employees shall remove themselves from any decisions that may reward or penalize students with whom they are or have been romantically or sexually involved. An employee violates this policy and his or her obligation to the student, to other students, to colleagues, and to the University when such employee participates in decisions that may reward or penalize a student with whom the employee has, or has had at any time, a romantic or sexual relationship.